Simple calculator for how much it'll cost you to go uphill - Jaguar I-Pace EV400 Forum
 1Likes
  • 1 Post By CyberSlug
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-01-2019, 11:52 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
sciencegeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,051
Simple calculator for how much it'll cost you to go uphill

Question: how much energy am I using for lifting the iPace 1000ft?

This question is relevant for those of us who may go for an outing to the mountains.

There's no reason to think that driving uphill takes energy for anything other than the work required to lift the vehicle. Drivetrain inefficiencies, driving style, whatever ... no reason to assume that those have an influence compared to just flat driving.

Therefore: we can predict with very high accuracy how many "extra" kWh we will use when we drive from Frisco (haha) at sea level to, say, Tahoe at 6000 ft ... compared to driving to a location that's also at sea level.

Here's the answer: 1.87 kWh per 1000ft, or 11.2 kWh. That's about 13% of your battery capacity. At 200 miles of range you'll lose 26 miles. That's not bad at all!
sciencegeek is online now  
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-02-2019, 12:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 131
Garage
Im planning to take mine up there after the snow melts in the spring (Im not willing to try my first EV trip to Tahoe in the winter when there are only 50kw chargers past Sacramento). Im looking forward to when I do eventually go up there though, and am hoping that penalty is close to accurate. If so it would mean a stop in El Dorado Hills or Placerville, but that wouldnt be a big deal.
gbillcb likes this.
CyberSlug is online now  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-03-2019, 12:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 357
And, you'll get 85% or more of that back coming back down.
WattAJag is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-03-2019, 12:54 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
sciencegeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by WattAJag View Post
And, you'll get 85% or more of that back coming back down.
Actually, it may be more than 85%. I've done a little science project this evening to look at regen efficiency on downhill vs energy expenditure on the uphill. I think I might put it in a separate thread.
sciencegeek is online now  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome